Yes but dont forget that Carbonate would be far less volume and far easier to transport out of NAL than the Spod equivalent. There would be considerable savings that might swing the decision.
Could it be an end user offtake agreement that makes the difference?
If a manufacturer came along and said "we would like to buy your carbonate!" before a refinery came along and said "we would like to buy your spodumene!" would that be all it takes to make the decision?
Sayona Quebec : chemical plant must be JOInTLy agreed upon, page-4
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 124 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add PLL (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
18.0¢ |
Change
-0.005(2.70%) |
Mkt cap ! $74.58M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 18.5¢ | 18.5¢ | 17.5¢ | $121.7K | 674.1K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | 505072 | 17.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 18.0¢ | 35728 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 28/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| PLL (ASX) Chart |