This is THE key point. The recoveries overall from CHN are much much worse.
There high grade zone is as follows:
So call Pd 80% which is in line with our Ni recoveries, Pt is around 70%, lose half the gold, Nickel and Cobalt at around 70% and Cu not bad. Mixed cons payability going to be questionable.
CTM will be 80% recoveries and 100% payability if we go to Sulphate (at extra cost to produce).
Point being Eq grades (after recoveries which is how they should be reported) will be better for CTM and a much simpler flowsheet
Edit: Oops used old data - recoveries even worse now maybe:
Jaguar vs. Julimar, page-4
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add CTM (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
43.0¢ |
Change
0.010(2.38%) |
Mkt cap ! $213.3M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 42.5¢ | 45.0¢ | 42.5¢ | $1.171M | 2.721M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5699 | 43.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 45.0¢ | 51840 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 28/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| CTM (ASX) Chart |