QPM General Discussion Thread, page-1504

with the greatest respect I beg to differ. Your long winded reply (IMHO) has a downramping undertone couched in a “temper your expectation” implying you’re ‘just helping’ holders. You’re not.
If GM pull out (or vice versa) I would expect some lucky Silk would be ordering a new motor boat on the proceeds of ensuring the contractual obligations are met. That’s what binding means.
There are really 2 main risks to this incredible project.
1. Funding/ dilution.
2. Proving the method to scale.
In a few weeks a highly anticipated and ground breaking DFS is going to be released which will answer many holders questions. You’ve invested in something pretty impressive and for some holders, such as myself, have a long held belief that this is where processing needs to be heading.