Typical response, "Its you not me" (to save your face)
Not going to defend your claims? What you can't?
Your entire post was to back up your claim that prompt disclosure on an issue is required by Tali.
That "disclosure" issue you think you found simply does not exist...and its clearly proven not to.
No luck needed.
Its an assumption by you to even think that I am risk-dismissive because I understand what a hypothetical "business risk" section of a report is. It probably means I understand them more than you actually do as you got it all wrong after reading.
Tali is full of its own risk and chances are it will not suceed. My investment in Tali is balanced to that risk...that is all that matters.
The truth is that what you posted is absolute rubbish of which even you can not obviously defend or say..."ah yeah...sorry for the post...you are right...market knows so my alarmist claim that prompt disclosue is needed was totally wrong".
You now being passive aggressive at me for setting you straight is a real good attitude after such a poor mistake...it would be alot smarter for you to learn from your clear and obvious mistake on this one than it is to worry about me and my risk and luck.
If you are in fact genuine and a contributer its not hard to say to everyone that you over reacted or better yet delete your stupid thread YOU made with totally unsubstantiated alarmist claims of requiring disclosure for new issues.
Fact is you either did not understand what you were reading and jumped on here ringing alarm bells as you did not know that the market already new all about the delay, or...you did it on purpose.
Your passing at me because of me simply posting a series of facts I found (not my own stuff) says a fair bit about you.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?