I quite agree with you there John. I consider that to discuss something as contentious as this is a +ve for the whole community. it ensures theres a verbal history of the debate and a renewal of the evidence against the lack of evidence for denial.
but to many people such denial is deeply offensive as well as being quite ill-informed. sensitivities too are valid imo and should be respected.
as it is our original interlocutor has vanished after tossing his grenade. so why do we now need to carry one? who is left that we are trying to convince?
