I quite agree with you there John. I consider that to discuss something as contentious as this is a +ve for the whole community. it ensures theres a verbal history of the debate and a renewal of the evidence against the lack of evidence for denial.
but to many people such denial is deeply offensive as well as being quite ill-informed. sensitivities too are valid imo and should be respected.
as it is our original interlocutor has vanished after tossing his grenade. so why do we now need to carry one? who is left that we are trying to convince?
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Moderated
Moderated, page-120
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 50 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
I88
INFINI RESOURCES LIMITED
Charles Armstrong, CEO & Managing Director
Charles Armstrong
CEO & Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online