What questions do holders want asked at the AGM?, page-94

Thanks heaps for the poster data. How did you get it? Did it go up after the presentation on Wednesday?

To be honest I was so discouraged by the lack of shareholder engagement here prior to the meeting that I nearly didn't send in my questions. Glad I did. Glad you did too. One of the questions on 3D sounded a bit like one of yours with the references to scale out or scale up from memory.

Wish I'd recorded the zoom meeting. I noted it was being recorded, but hadn't prep ed to record it myself. In my experience its worth taking a look at records again usually. I'd like to go through it again. So much information was in - for instance MSBs ODAC presentation that holders and most observers missed. In my opinion people almost rewrite their memories - we are just so biased to hearing what we expect (and usually what we want to hear).

I also think things are sometimes dropped in the details that companies don't appreciate the significant of - again I reference another company - Dr Rose's acknowledgement of problems with the potency assay in a webinar. Its never been acknowledged to my knowledge outside of that webinar yet it puts a lot of other things about MSB's potency assay and the FDA's comments into perspective that don't make sense otherwise, in my opinion.

I found Ross's responses to some of the questions I asked to be pretty good - (No to the mend milestones payment) Yes to the Fujifilm option (I made that yes or no to be brief - sometimes may doesn't also imply maybe not. You and I may obey the laws of physics - doesn't logically follow if someone uses that way of speaking that we may not).

I thought the approach to GvHD seemed sensible.

Ross's answer to the 3D prototyping (Q6) I found helped me understand his way of thinking - but I still think .... well a comment for another day.

Really interested in seeing the meeting again on zoom or elsewhere if that's doable?