artemis boundary, page-47

Excellent summary Iam.
It sure is baffling as to what their "status quo" problem is at present.

Hopefully we'll find out shortly.

One thing in your post intrigues me:

"10 Mar 2009 MEO stated its working interest in WA-360-P had increased to 70% by contributing 90% of the cost of the Artemis 3D survey of 360-P. This led to the present share arrangement of MEO 70%, CUE 15% and Gascorp 15%."

Who coughed up for the remaining 10% of the 3D seismics?

Was it one of the PP's or was it a residual of the RDI funding?