'''the govt tried to reverse NG in 1986 and it was an absolute disaster and it was quickly reversed.'''
Did you read the original post or just robotically reply or do you disagree with it because you saw something different?
The OP pasted:
'''Claim 2: We saw what happened when the negative gearing tax break was abolished in 1985. Investors stopped building new homes and and rents soared. That will happen again.
Response: Sorry, but that is an urban myth. Yes, construction fell, but by investors and owner-occupiers alike, and why? Because interest rates soared to 17.5 per cent for investors and 15.5 per cent for owner-occupiers. Even so, construction by investors was a higher share of GDP in those years than in 2009.
As for rents, Bureau of Statistics figures show capital city rents rose 22 per cent in the two years when the tax break was abolished, and 23 per cent in the following two years after it was restored. End of urban myth!'''
- Forums
- Property
- negative gearing myths
negative gearing myths, page-4
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)