I will not debate such a blatant liar.
I will provide information for any that wish to DTOR.
This patent;
"Method for producing a hydrogen enriched fuel and carbon nanotubes using microwave assisted methane decomposition on catalyst.
Abstract
A method for producing a hydrogen enriched fuel and carbon nanotubes includes the steps of providing a flow of methane gas, and providing a catalyst mixture comprising a Fe based catalyst and carbon. The method also includes the steps of pretreating the catalyst mixture using microwave irradiation and exposure to CH
4, heating the catalyst mixture and the methane gas using microwave irradiation at a selected microwave power, directing the flow of methane gas over the catalyst mixture, and controlling the microwave power to produce a product gas having a selected composition and the carbon nanotubes. For producing multi walled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) only a flow of methane gas into the reactor is required. For producing single walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs), a combination of hydrogen gas and methane gas into the reactor is required."
is not this patent in any aspect;
"System and method for producing hydrogen and a carbon nanoproduct
Abstract
A system for producing hydrogen and a carbon nanoproduct includes a hydrocarbon feed gas supply configured to supply a hydrocarbon feed gas at a selected flow rate, a reactor having a hollow reactor cylinder with an enclosed inlet adapted to continuously receive the hydrocarbon feed gas, a reaction chamber in fluid communication with the inlet, and an enclosed outlet in fluid communication with a reaction chamber adapted to discharge a product gas comprised of hydrogen and unreacted hydrocarbon feed gas, along with the carbon nanoproduct. The system also includes a catalyst transport system adapted to move a selected amount of a metal catalyst through the reaction chamber at a rate dependent on the flow rate of the hydrocarbon feed gas to form the product gas. The system also includes a carbon separator adapted to separate the carbon product from the product gas and from the metal catalyst."
https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2013109310A1/en?inventor=Gregory SolomonEdenCrete sales were up 12% last quarter, not falling as the liar is claiming.
EDE is only beginning to discuss CNT sales, not failing for the 10/20/30/750 yrs being claimed.
There are companies worldwide playing catch up to EDE's technologies in the methane pyrolysis area. In these times of undoubtable humanmade climate change, it has become an imperative.
BASF is an example of the huge R&D and 15 yr timeframe to develop this 'crackpot' technology. EDE is 5 steps ahead by concentrating on the value added, more lucrative field of commercialising the carbon in the form of CNT and letting the hydrogen industry build in the meantime.
None of this is cheap or easy. EDE caught a harsh break when the push to a hydrogen economy was swapped out for EVs. They changed focus, not direction and are now at the right place at the right time as the hydrogen economy has come to the fore again. The huge global impacts of the last couple of yrs are why EDE is not where they expected to be, not because they are going in the wrong direction.
EDE salaries have increased with the CPI each yr, as any company would. The FUDsters trying to call them out should look around at comparative salaries and stop trying to defame the company by making up stories of under the table dealings. Or maybe start their own companies with a drive to improve the planet and see how they go. Seems a better use of their time than bashing other companies and being jealous.
IMO DYOR GLTS
(20min delay)