Despite all the mining in the world, and despite all levels of corruption, greed, back-door deals, bribery and malpractice etc, a dispute over rights to a mining tenement is incredibly rare. And in the incredibly rare occasion that there is a dispute, almost all of those occasions are related to native claim to land.
The smoking gun is, you have a seemingly bullet-proof case on AVZ's side (of course that is going to be AVZ's position), but somewhere, somehow, there is a counter party who is convinced it is entirely the opposite. And their conviction is so high that they are willing to go to these lengths to dispute it.
Those in mining circles know that typically, when title or tenement claims come into disrepute, its a long road to a resolution, even longer when its corporations and government against each other, rather than traditional land holders who typically don't have the firepower behind them to push their case as hard.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AVZ
- Ann: Disclosure Clarifications - AFR Article
Ann: Disclosure Clarifications - AFR Article, page-117
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 188 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AVZ (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
SER
STRATEGIC ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED
David DeTata, Managing Director
David DeTata
Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online