Which part isn’t proven? The entire thing. That’s which part. Point me to which announcement/s clearly stipulates the current value of our resource. I’m not asking you to direct me to multiple figures and whatnot that require people to do their ‘own’ mathematics - I’m asking you to show me where Tim has clearly stated to the market what the value of our resource is.
What you’re doing as an example is essentially saying, look, he’s a a run down shed on a block of rural land that’s not even worth $100k, however, there’s supposedly over 10,000 oz. under that shed, so, therefore, I’m valuing that shed and land at over 10mil - who’s interested in buying it? **Crickets.
I really can’t reiterate this enough - a stock that proposes to be sitting on MULTIBILLION dollars worth of a commodity does NOT simply stay under the radar and get valued at less than 100mil for as long as this has. It’s just fanciful to think otherwise.
ESS Price at posting:
31.5¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held
