Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Makes me sick, page-5

First 5 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
JACK

22,132 Posts.

14

02/01/23

14:20

Post #: 65499043
Share

Originally posted by johngalt815 ↑

If a man or woman finds a 17 year old attractive they are considered a paedophile, according to this definition every human would be considered a paedophile at some stage. This is incorrect because there is a world of difference between attracting to a teenager which has gone through puberty vs a child which has not reached puberty. Many countries in the world have a legal age for sex at 16, some countries even 14.

A minor is a legal definition of anyone under the age 18, therefore calling them a minor is the correct terminology, it would be incorrect to label someone finding a 17 year old attractive as a paedophile the same as for someone attracted to pre pubescent humans, which our current media does.

Expand

John,

If you wish to agree with destigmatising paedophiles then so be it.

Whatever blows ya hair back I suppose.

Me I prefer pedos to be known as pedos and punished as such.

Last edited by JACK: 02/01/23
29 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

FBU

Fletcher Building 'exploring options' around construction division sale

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 018 – Potatoes, TACOs, and the $120M helicopter heist

CIA

'Share long-term visions': Champion Iron rallies on mooted Nippon, Sojitz partnership

RML

Resolution Minerals appoints industry experts to fast-track US growth strategy

ASX Market Close: How a megadam in Tibet pushed us into the red

First 5 Last