>Business professors, have never owned a business, they're broke hahahaha...." Did I say that people should study business at university?
Let me be even more explicit. You aren't getting it.
You are defending Tates character based on the fact that he has money. Do you offer Gina Rinehart the same privilege?
It's possible for someone of poor character to say some true things and be correct.
>Your posts are just a litany of projections and straw-men arguments based on false premises . For example? I'll take one example of each. There's a litany, should be easy.
1) a projection 2) a *** argument 3) a false premise
It's funny that in your replies to other posters you claim to be a "critical thinker" and yet you lack the critical thinking skills to consider that, perhaps, the Tate persona is entirely made up to create division.
