fuel, ore , water and delivery issues solved, page-20

No, no - no mistake.

Im not sure what you are getting at - but I will try.

Its like comparing a Ferrari (ESI) with a Kia (WEC). They are both cars but compete in different sub sectors.

Instos will compare the 2 because its the best comparison available.

WEC can only compete with Coldry in sub bit. In Coldrys target market - high moisture lignite - WEC cant compete.

LYP, Tincom, Poland nail that point clearly.

Then there is Matmor - can WEC compete? No again.

I made some statements about WEC V ESI re capex and opex.

Can you prove them wrong? You need to otherwise you are admitting even in WEC's target market - sub bit - ESI are superior.

Even in the sub bit - WEC is the underdog now IF ECT choose to compete in sub bit.

Water - since you say "wec is a superior product" - you imply you have an intimate knowledge re WEC tech. So what is the treatment process for WEC water?

These are the ONLY points that matter - capex/opex and water. Tell us your reasoning why "wec is a superior product"?