I think it's important to consider totally of evidence. I concede that's difficult in this climate of such fierce censorship, as former AMA president Dr. Kerryn Phelps says in her submission.
Here's a link to the Altman Report. IMO it's well-referenced:
https://www.biznews.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Altman-Report-Final-Version-11-8-22.pdfDr. Altman has 40 years' experience designing clinical trials and drug development. He's worked closely with the TGA. In his report, he provides evidence of governments' inflation of deaths by fudging "with" and "from" Covid. What he says is consistent with an open letter from UK doctors and scientist to the MHRA and what people have been saying online, including journalist Bel Mooney whose father's death was recorded as from Covid, whereas he died from a long-term chronic lung disease.
I've been looking into whether there was (and still is) an in-hospital Covid treatment protocol. Clinicians I've talked to online have said it's killing patients. You can listen to veteran RN Colette Martin giving public testimony at a Health and Welfare hearing of the Louisiana House of Reps She says she believes the treatment is killing patients:
https://house.louisiana.gov/H_Video/VideoArchivePlayer?v=house%2F2021%2Fnov%2F1108_21_HW
Pierre Kory MD, who has run ICU units, has the same view. He said at a press meeting in early March 2022 that patients were landing on vents because "doctors are doing really dumb stuff", following a protocol that comes out of "some building in Washington". You can find his articles on substack.
The cornerstone of the protocol is drug Remdesivir, a three-time failure that showed no mortality benefit in Covid. The Davis drug guide says it can cause respiratory failure. I think the mechanism is that it can cause kidney damage, which then causes fluid to build up in the lungs. The lungs can be damaged when a patient is put on a vent because of there being less volume of air to compress.
Remdesivir has also been linked to cardiac damage:
https://www.cureus.com/articles/44072-cardiac-adverse-events-with-remdesivir-in-covid-19-infectionhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34202350/Remdesivir is an expensive drug and for its use hospitals in the US get a 20% reimbursement bonus added to the entire hospital bill. Amidwesterndoctor (I suspect is a group) provides evidence of conflicts of interest re. royalties among NIH members:
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/how-corruption-dictates-the-practice?s=wI went to see physician here in Melbourne. He told me treatment for Covid patients was dictated from above and at that time (October 2021) he was using Remdesivir and Sotrovimab. There was different treatment according to vax status.
"Covid is worse"Even this early study by Patone el al., which was redone after objections that it didn't look at risk factors by age groups, showed an increased risk for myocarditis from the shots in under 40s, skewed to males:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8863574/The study links to an overview of studies saying Covid itself causes heart problems. If, however, you look at one of the papers they link to by Sandoval et al., the authors themselves say myocarditis is difficult to diagnose, the methods to diagnose it weren't the same and they include Covid patients with prior cardiovascular complications.
But it's important to remember we're talking about giving prophylactic medicine to young and healthy people.Moreover, the limitations of the Patone et al. study are significant because it covered the time period before most younger people in the UK had been injected with the mRNA shots. The authors do some damage control, saying vaccine-induced myocarditis might be more diagnosed because troponin levels are more tested for but in reality I've learned the opposite is the case. That's to be expected in a world where no doctor is allowed to speak against the Covid vaccines.
This study from Thailand is a good one because troponin levels were measured:
https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202208.0151/v1The link is to a preprint but the study has since been published. It found almost 30% of subjects had biomarkers indicating potential damage and 2 adolescents were hospitalised. The study is consistent with real world reports such as that of Monte Vista school in CA where, out of 800 students, there have been 4 cases of vaccine-induced myocarditis.
Here in Australia, we were assured myocarditis from the shots was 1/74000 but even before the roll out, we already knew of two journalists - Georgia Clark and Denham Hitchcock - who had been hospitalised after Pfizer. The latter case was certainly not mild. in the absence of long-term follow up and images, I don't know how anyone can claim such injuries are mild. In fact, Bozkurt et al. found evidence of fibrosis after mRNA shots. Any scarring of the heart is a major risk for chronic heart failure in the future.
You can see in the Altman Report above on page 23, children who have suffered heart attacks after the mRNA drugs and in the link to the Louisiana House of Reps you can listen to two ICU nurses (cardiac and general) giving testimony about the "terrifying" vax injuries they're seeing. The nurses speak at the one hour mark. They both say the cases are not being reported to VAERS.
Most importantly IMO, if you use the "Covid is worse" argument, you need to have clear evidence from the original clinical trials that the drugs reduce the risk of worse disease. The "gold standard" Pfizer drug now given to children as young as six months showed absolutely no benefit in all cause morbidity or mortality. In fact, if you look in the supplementary appendix there's a signal for increased risk of cardiac arrest.
