its such a legalistic technicality that you cant refer to a 12 month old scoping study. nickel price increase is bullish, extended nickel deposit is crazy bullish for the project but you cant say so because analysis of cost inputs are out of date 12 months?
they can retract as they are forced to, but the merits of the project have improved exactly where you would want.
Ann: Retraction of Statements in Announcement, page-24
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 9 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add SBR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.5¢ |
Change
-0.001(6.25%) |
Mkt cap ! $5.614M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.6¢ | 1.6¢ | 1.5¢ | $27.59K | 1.731M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 1094683 | 1.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.6¢ | 39667 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 27/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SBR (ASX) Chart |