The Answer, page-11

  1. 2,979 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 5
    The lack of "good science" is why my wife and me decided not to inject ourself with a novel treatment for a virus that has a 99.95% survival rate (higher for us being in our 30s).

    She works in the pharmaceutical industry, worked on vaccine trials in the past and was included in the Novavax trial. She has an understanding of data collecting and hence understands the short cuts that were taken bringing your beloved MRNA juice to the market where YOU are the test subject.

    So "The answer" to the thread that you decided to make, to label me a conspiracy terrorist for no other reason that I understand how the pharmaceutical industry works and you dont is laughable.

    "Good science" doesnt mind being questioned, "good science" is openly discussed among those qualified in all fields on expertise, "good science" doesnt need mandates, coercion or brainwashing campaigns.

    So please, stick your "good science" up yours as the last 3 years had nothing to do with good "science" and had a handfull of companies profit into the 100s of billions of USD.

    Maybe bring your word salad to one of @RedCedar his "succesful" covid threads where you brainwashed normies can discuss "$cience"
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.