WGO 0.00% 35.5¢ warrego energy limited

Ann: Change in substantial holding from MIN, page-20

ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM
CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
  1. 8,631 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 2953
    Good posts above.

    I posted this a few days ago.

    ***************
    Hancock has 26%
    MIN has about 16.35%
    STX has 19.9% ( plus maybe another 11%) = total maybe 31% ?

    So maybe about 73.25% already !!!
    *****************************************
    Update it now:

    Hancock has 26%
    MIN has about 19.17%
    STX has 19.9% ( plus maybe another 11%) = total maybe 31% ?
    Total = 76.17%

    So I think we can assume a couple of things:
    - MIN will go to 19.9% -
    - Hancock  probably doesn't have many acceptances in Acceptance Facility - (because I think if H did, then they would need to lodge a Change in Sub S/H notice to include those shares in their holdings !!???) And they have not done so.
    - there are always smaller retail shareholders who do not manage their shareholdings, and therefore will not voluntarily accept any offer - they await compulsory acquisition -> ergo there will not be 100% of shares available to purchase on the market.

    If we assume MIN goes to 19.9% then total of those three shareholders = 77% approx.

    So that theoretically leaves just 23% of shares available for acquisition - but as above some shareholders won't do anything unless forced to.

    So being conservative - I bet there are only 20% of shares available to be purchased anyway.
    Thus that's only 245m shares left !!

    Why would a new bidder stump up a bid of say 40c cash, if they can only gain a 20% toe-hold?

    They would need to convince one of STX, MIN, or Hancock to sell.

    I see that the only outcome here is for two of the 3 to agree to a deal ie one sells out.
    At this point MIN has the highest cost for their 20%.

    This stand-off simply will not stand in the short-term, because each will fight for a board seat or two, each will have their own agenda, and each will need to agree to a exploration and devt program.

    As Operator, STX can claim it can set the agenda, and delay exploration and dev't of WE - but I simply cannot see either of Hancock or MIN sitting back and being run-over by STX. Those guys are "doers".
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add WGO (ASX) to my watchlist

Currently unlisted public company.

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.