WDS too cheap?, page-1210

I suspect I'm wasting valuable time here. If you sell short you've been loaned shares and have a contractual obligation to return those shares at some point, and therefore hold exposure to share price movements. I've seen people argue excessively over how a short seller should disclose their exposure. In my view they should have "sell" and "held", to show they hold exposure through a share loan agreement. This differentiates them from people with an opinion of "sell", but with no exposure. But I'm not the disclosure police so you can disclose the way that pleases you.

I only asked the question of you as you're consistently negative posts seem at odds with your disclosure of "none" and "held", so thought if you're short you should make that clear. You state however that you're holding long, still post negative comments about the stock, and have a sentiment of "none". I guess that covers all bases, you're negative (from your posts), neutral (from your sentiment), and positive (as why else would you hold the stock).

I won't engage with you any further, best of luck with your position (whatever that is).