NAL bid condition precedent incorporated a requirement for a processing plant to be completed within a timeframe (within 10 years, so I think). Why delay the construction when there is that condition precedent on SYAQ? is not building it a significant risk to the venture?Could the value added of the carbonate processing possibly outweigh the benefit of the offtake for PLL (in fact, it might be the case now)? I will attempt the maths sometime soon.
General Discussion Topics, page-89680
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 51,269 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add SYA (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
3.6¢ |
Change
-0.002(5.26%) |
Mkt cap ! $370.5M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 3.7¢ | 3.7¢ | 3.5¢ | $2.158M | 59.44M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 2625000 | 3.6¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 3.7¢ | 5881377 | 21 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 28/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SYA (ASX) Chart |