I do not want to piss on the parade here, but the communication someone posted between Alkane and there consultants and the government, I need to go back and find the post, but when I read it at the time my summary was the government was trying to push for a certain design and Alkane replied saying if they followed a proposed design it would mean the Tomingley Extention would be uneconomical.
I appreciate the above is very vague, but I need to go back and check what was posted on HC.
Given the issues were not resolved and will basically be dealt with at a later date, does this mean the Tomingjey extension is uneconomic until Alkane resolve this issue with the government, even if the Tomingjey extension is approved, it will be subject to final design surely?
This could suppress the SP until the design issues are resolved?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- ALK
- Ann: Investor Presentation - Bell Potter Unearthed
Ann: Investor Presentation - Bell Potter Unearthed, page-103
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add ALK (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
43.5¢ |
Change
0.030(7.41%) |
Mkt cap ! $262.9M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
42.5¢ | 44.0¢ | 42.0¢ | $428.6K | 1.000M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 26318 | 43.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
43.5¢ | 14527 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 26318 | 0.430 |
1 | 13571 | 0.425 |
3 | 39528 | 0.420 |
1 | 2361 | 0.415 |
2 | 25000 | 0.410 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.435 | 14527 | 1 |
0.440 | 87325 | 2 |
0.445 | 32085 | 5 |
0.450 | 45000 | 3 |
0.455 | 35010 | 4 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 13/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
ALK (ASX) Chart |
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online