Share
2,890 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 2044
clock Created with Sketch. 07/03/23
08:51
Share
Originally posted by itzgr82balive
↑
We'll see jlo2012. Whether ISX/JK had their performance shares in mind or not (I happen to think they did - who wouldn't?) is unimportant. It makes good copy but is inconsequential. What ASIC needs to show on a balance of probabilities is that ISX/JK did the integrations without the shareholder in mind. And that just does not make sense. They are all shareholders and no reasonable person can assume that they would do these integrations without the expectation that it would create revenue for shareholders. This is because this is the only way shareholders shares (and more importantly - their shares) would be worth anything at the end of the day. ISX/JK did not destroy ISX AU, ASX and ASIC did. It was chugging along just fine until they suspended without cause.
Expand
I'm truly curious. If the Court makes and adverse finding against JK/ISX - will you accept that or will you try and suggest it made the wrong decision?
