The corrected version.
Zebster,
The difference in words may relate to the penalties for off spec product, which may deter MCR from delivering it, even if BHP were to accept it?
The absence of information about the potential severity of the problem is concerning.
Maybe it’s a temporary issue, temporarily requiring stockpiling - Insignificant NPV impact
Maybe it’s a long term issue requiring substantial LT stockpiling - Very minor NPV impact
But if Cassini has major arsenic issues, and if they can’t fully be resolved by blending then perhaps this could result in substantial reduction in reserves and major NPV impact. [Sorry TB but a new mill likely wouldn’t solve the problem].
If it’s a major problem then I doubt it’s in the northern operations, because it doesn’t appear to have been a major problem at Durkin or Long in the past, has it?
Whatever, management owe us, the owners, a much more detailed explanation of the extent of the problem. Major stuff ups have obviously occurred on DS’s watch. Hedging, financing top ups and now mine planning (perhaps poor understanding of an ore body or scant assaying?). Is there anything else they are not telling us about??
EL
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- MCR
- Ann: Operations and Guidance Update
Ann: Operations and Guidance Update, page-54
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 43 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add MCR (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online