Share
22,569 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 90
clock Created with Sketch.
02/04/23
21:50
Share
Originally posted by rocket973:
↑
You obviously come from a different background from me if you think what Greenwich said in the first place is acceptable.“Mark Latham is a disgusting human being and people who are considering voting for One Nation need to realise they are voting for an extremely hateful and dangerous individual who risks causing a great deal of damage to our state,” Mr Greenwich said last week. I think what Greenwich said is disgusting and uncalled for, Mark Latham was obviously upset by being deliberately targeted by Greenwich all because he gave a speech trying to protect young children from the grooming by homosexuals who are looking for more prey. As Latham said "'When he calls someone a disgusting human being for attending a meeting in a church hall, maybe attention will turn to some of his habits,' he said." I'd think Greenwich would've been better to keep his mouth shut and keep his unnatural sexual desires and antics to himself and not demean others just because they don't want their young children to become the gay prey. What did Greenwich expect Latham to say? Good on you mate go head and groom as many school kiddies as you like. No, Latham is standing up for himself and the children he wants to protect. Whilst the comment is considered rude by the leftie halfwits, the fact is its true and describes their sexual act perfectly. "'Disgusting? How does that compare with sticking your d*** up a bloke's a*** and covering it with s***?' Mr Latham wrote."
Expand
The point I was making is that Greenwich's comments are personally directed at Latham. Latham's comments are directed at people of gay sexual orientation. if Latham feels insulted by Greenwich he has the right to respond to Greenwich. The condemnation comes because his comment is directed at gays, not because it's directed at Greenwich. Reaper.