Seems The Dalek has been given a time out, pity, he's certainly passionate.
Actually Chris Joye uses his own blog for the same information and is used and quoted by the RBA (unlike Kris Sayce - a property nobody), and the big difference is Chris Joye posts on HOUSING for property readers, not stocks.
my post pointed out that each person pushes an agenda for monetary gain, one goes for stocks, the other goes for property, then they attack each other in the middle.
as opposed to a real SPUIKER, KRIS SAYCE, who posts on property to drive readers to stocks. Hmmm, slight difference isn't it.
Actually no, there isn't any difference, according to the Rismark website: 'Christopher is the founder and Managing Director of the award-winning research and investment group, Rismark International' and on Rismark's welcome screen: 'Rismark International ("Rismark") is a global funds management and advisory business that has expertise in the execution of sophisticated real estate research and investment strategies.' (www.rismark.com.au)
There is Chris Joye's motivation summed up right there. For balance, let's see what Kris Sayce's motivation is: 'Kris shares his insights and passion for small-cap stocks with subscribers of Australian Small Cap Investigator ... and espouses his critical views of the economic landscape in the free daily e-letter, Money Morning'. (http://www.portphillippublishing.com.au/aboutus.html)
So they clearly both have a monetary reason for dealing out free advice.
Chris Joye has ripped Sayce to pieces on numerous occasions - the comparison to a Cambridge PHD is insulting really. Sayce is a 20lb weakling.
The two take pot shots at each other for their own purposes, it's not a question of who is smarter or more qualified.
I would recommend readers take CBTMs comments as the grain of uninformed salt it really deserves, as he can't seem to differentiate what a spuiker really does.
I would also recommend all readers on a free forum take my posts with a grain of salt and make their own decisions based on full and fair analysis using objective information.
