Ann: MTD025 Extends Nickel Mineralisation, page-16

Obviously a great next step here. Key takeaways for me:

• pXRF in use now. Usage differs between teams and depending on what you're analysing... I look forward to understanding if the company's pXRF readings are close to / above / below the reality when lab results come through. 0.33% Ni based on pXRF
• "This high conductance (~5,000-15,000S) offhole anomaly was not previously identified during the ground based MLEM survey". Amazing... what DOES lie at the points highlighted by the survey? What ELSE lies where the MLEM hasn't highlighted areas of opportunity
• "None of the intersections of remobilised sulphide seen down the hole appear to explain the anomaly within the intrusion"

Anyone know much about timelines involved in downhole EM surveying? I.e. what's the lead time between dropping the equipment down the hole to interpretation (obviously, interpretation varies on complexity of geology)