Ann: Race releases complete cardio-protection data & video, page-99

I fully agree. All the arguments are generally along the lines of "one trick pony" etc. Been here for a long time and the only time I can remember anyone coming on here with any rational arguments/questions as a non-holder was @IndexInvestor a few years ago. Those questions were answered so well that I believe index is now one of the largest holders on here. I really appreciated the questions as it helped strengthen my conviction and made me a lot more money.

The mudslinging over the IMU/RAC wall is often dressed up as "hope that *insert competitor name* is successful because it'll be great for patients" whilst at the same time taking shots. Really what most are thinking is "hope we are successful before you so I can rub it in your face".

I see that someone forwarded Masons post onto someone inside IMU and got back in-depth answers. I don't know who's right and who's wrong, but it's great for holders if it increases their conviction. Yet people want to hate on "outsiders" with coherent arguments because they think they have ulterior motives. They just want to hear from people who hold the stock...who by definition hold the stock because they think it will be successful and make them money. Sets up an echo chamber. Maybe they do have other motives, who knows... but I would encourage anyone to come over and give some sort of argument...anything coherent at all. Havent seen anything since @IndexInvestor in a few years.

I will admit, I do find the back and forth entertaining though.