Hi again, names.
Unfortunately for you, I’ll have to maintain you still haven’t substantiated why you believe Tim is pursuing funding.
And I encourage you to keep grasping at semantics if it’ll help you continue feeling ‘glad’ but whether it ‘seems to suggest’ to me you’ve failed in reading the SS or I ‘conclude’ you haven’t - they’re pretty much both the same thing…
The only logical explanation why you haven’t confirmed whether you’ve read the scoping study or not is because doing so would mean you can no longer spam the threads pretending to be confused with the inference ESS would be valued at a minimum of $1 per share.
Speaking of the viewers in HC world, perhaps you could share with us all why you’ve failed in acknowledging whether you’ve read it or not?
Again, I intend to.
News: ESS Tianqi Lithium Terminates Plan Of Acquiring Essential Metals, page-186
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?