WAK 1.96% 5.0¢ wa kaolin limited

Ann: March 2023 Quarterly Activities Report and Appendix 5B, page-20

ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM
CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
  1. 4,240 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1233
    MJC212

    Thanks for you past posts - they always make a lot of sense.

    My previous post in reply to your previus post, had a basic theme, and that is that WAK should find niches, and not fret over the markets it should not enter, and thus far the E-Glass subsector seems a good candidate, because it requires high purity (preferably very high purity) kaolin, especially in respect to carbonaceous matter and iron. I have seen no comment on titanium as a contaminant, but WAK's primary ore is low on that too. I have seen no comment on particle shape, size and size distribution, but that may be because for E-glass, WAK's product fits into whatever is specified in that regard.

    I have read somewhere that I cannot recall, that dry-blow kaolin is what the E-Glass subsector buys, and perhaps the glass sector generally. That is technical stuff that I read about on the Internet, and not being a guru in the game, I do not attach too much weight to my understanding of stuff that I have read. The sockdologer for me is that, in spite of Advanced Minerals International (AMI) being in the E-glass game, Dak Tai Trading, a proxy for Stanco International, is buying K99F, and now K999F if the “F” is an apt suffix, and placing large orders. Maybe the reason is that WAK's ore, being a primary ore, allows it to compete with AMI in that subsector. It could simply be because Dak Tai Trading obtained exclusive distribution rights, and being a supplier of other feedstocks, it can shift WAK's kaolin as a complementery product at a better margin, in spite of it being no better than AMI's product.

    In the same don't-tangle-with-the-tough-guys theme, I suggest that WAK's interest in the paper-coatings market may be misplaced. I believe what is going to happen is that circa 2025, if finance and hiring employees is not a problem, and WAK wants more capacity for demand that it then has, Management could treat Stage 3 as a simple third dry-float step. If Management wants to play around with K99 as feedstock for wet-processing, it can do so at low cost at Kwinana, where they used to have a mothballed wet-processing test plant. If it's still there, it may make sense to use it. WAK may then learn that it cannot find a niche, and abandon the idea before wasting real money.

    On FYI, which I used to hold, but quickly decided that the notion that its IP is uniquely valuable was fraught with doubt, so I sold out. The basics of making alumina from kaolin has been around for a hundred years, and Alcan was the leader of the pack circa WW2. My question is, would it make sense for the ultra-purity-alumina (4N and 5N) hopefuls to abandon extracting their own kaolin, and simply buy K999 from WAK as a feedstock. The nearology of being close to Alcoa's WA activity could be relevant.

    Do other dry-float players like produce 99.9% pure kaolin?
    Last edited by Pioupiou: 05/05/23
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add WAK (ASX) to my watchlist
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.