Originally posted by JB1975:
↑
Okay, I've come back to here from your other post. I've a hard copy of the study you referred to.
Expand
"This article that you've referenced isn't a very good match for what CYP is doing - wrong places on the foot" Further evidence that there is no point in me wasting my time replying to you moving forward. Posts like this and the one that you sent to the ASX (
) demonstrate your inability to properly analyse a document and challenge your original hypothesis (which in both cases is wrong).
My advice to you is find a specialist to vent your concerns to, as frankly anyone forced to listen to your verbal diarrhea deserves to be paid.
) demonstrate your inability to properly analyse a document and challenge your original hypothesis (which in both cases is wrong).
(20min delay)