Share
8,462 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 53
clock Created with Sketch.
14/05/23
15:10
Share
Originally posted by pintohoo:
↑
'' I or Brittany's supervisors had a duty of care'' it's not 'I' and it's the employer ---------- sorry, you aren't aware of how the system works if it's not clear to you or any here that she was dealt with by the people called security - government employees - if you don't understand that there's a duty of care involved here - then, you really shouldn't be voting, nor driving duty of care includes looking after people at all hours that they are on the property, duty of care involves dealing and protecting employees at any stage if you don't understand that EVERY employee has a responsibility to every other employee - then, I'm afraid that you just don't get the society we live in I'll put it simple for the lower intellects out there ---------- if you are in a workplace and you see a colleague who is drunk - YOU are responsible for doing something about it if you see someone drunk driving on the street or driving erratically - YOU are responsible to do something about it now - frankly - I think you are now wasting a lot of time with events on a politics forum - chasing matters that are minor and irrelevant to the goodwill of the nation ------------ you didn't used to do that it's like many here now who are fiddling whilst Rome is burning
Expand
weren't the pair after hours so how did they get into a government building? who let them in, why let them in , was this a common practice to let staffers in after hours, and full of grog? lots of simple question for the peanuts