No i'm not. Those are you're 12 best results and 6 of those look good. But those are 12 holes
out of how many. You can view the full drill result at the back on the announcement.
Looks like 10-15% have the right thickness to depth.
View attachment 5284126View attachment 5284141you can clearly see it's not from surface to 25m depth. Most of the results are under cover thicker than the REO clay profile.
So maybe 10-15% looks viable if it's ionic. (which maybe isn't all that much of a resource) 0% viable if it's not.
Look at the average thickness and depth - not discrete areas.
View attachment 5284162Average thickness/average cover = strip (simple terms)
SF2TH
(20min delay)