How could NAG shareholders possibly benefit from a merger/takeover from SXG (who also don't have a mining licence and are at least ten years away from production....if ever).
===========================================
no mining license and to production in 10 years most nag holders will be happy with that feat
nag allegedly has mining license and had Trumbull for 16 years with no results or pathway as to when mining will ever start.
nag holders will benefit without Trumbull at least new ideas will arise from his departure
Trumbull can be served section 249D tomorrow if 5% substantial holder wants to take that path and Trumbull’s shares won’t save him
Assays - where are the assays?, page-49
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 159 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
