Media Thread, page-8958

Hi Outlander,
" I just can’t believe that they would risk their considerable reputations, by ALL getting carried away, and recklessly ‘mis-leading’ the scientific community about their cancer research."
I have been mulling this very thing myself for a couple of weeks now; I was caught out once before about 6 years ago by a non scientific CEO stating they 'will' show positive results in the treatment of Alzheimers; subsequently proved to be wrong (misleading SH) and it all went to shite; now if it was PH doing the presenting and being the face of the company I would much more sceptical but our esteemed CEO and associates are a totally different level; they simply can't tarnish reputations by misleading the SH or industry or public in general.
During the previous spike I did a bit of trading due to the above subject and of course the kind Slick giving me the fortitude to do so, I was eventually free carried; now I've increased my holdings to more than I have ever held by a long way simply because of the dare I say it "science".
Enough said GLTAH.