Reject the Voice., page-74

Just look at the simple demographics

A vast rich land inhabited for supposedly 60,000 years and all they had to show for it was about 1 million inhabitants.

Something doesn't add up does it sunshine - especially when the populations to their north (from which the aborigines originated from) were far more advanced (and populated) even by western standards.

You have to ask yourself why the Hindus could build temples such as Angkor Wat in Cambodia and the aborigines didn't even have a bow and arrow.

They obviously didn't eat enough as their life expectancy would have been very low to have such a low population