''True and verified according to skewed agenda driven DBT interpretations and supported by skewed and agenda driven Islamic website interpretations.''
That's rubbish and you know it. The Baha'i history being quoted is not false, it comes directly from Baha'i archives, everything can be verified and I have referenced several different sites, including your irrationally contested Baha'i community library (actually including other Baha'i libraries) and they all essentially say the same thing, Ali against Baha, Shogi breaking the covenant, Baha'u'llah poisoned by his Jealous brother, etc, etc, which is the point and which proves that none of the Baha'i leaders were infallible and they did not in fact always act according to the moral values of the organization.
There is nothing honest you can say to refute the facts, Dr Kam, so you engage dishonestly, false accusation, insults and denial being your stock in trade.
