Keeping things the "same" means nothing will change.
Both sides of the argument agree that the system is not working now.
A. Libs say that Indigenous are "spoilt" with $30b plus actual costs $3b. So its about the money.
B. Lab say that Indigenous request a "Voice" enshrined in the Constitution. So its about Treaty.
So are the Indigenous entitled to a say when we already have a lobbyist charter? Why not join the Lobby group?
If you were told you own nothing, unable to forge your own destiny
How would you feel.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Why I will say YES to the voice.
Why I will say YES to the voice.
- There are more pages in this discussion • 45 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online