Did you not stop to consider that if the "same" isn't working, then it's that which needs to be addressed?
This is not achieved by doubling down and locking-in the "same" to the Constitution.
The desired outcome in the the VOICE is similar to what was in ATSIC!
Who would u have greater faith in, Bob Hawke who only legislated ATSIC or Albo who wanted the VOICE in the Constitution.
Vote NO if u prefer and have greater faith in Bob Hawke ability and assessment compared to Albo.
The Coalition prefers to simply legislate and avoid enshrining it in the Constitution.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Why I will say YES to the voice.
Why I will say YES to the voice., page-43
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
MND
Albemarle lithium downsize burns $200M hole in Monadelphous's pocket as latter's contracts terminated
KAI
Pilbara Minerals buys land off Kairos part of its York gold project for $20M – and a 2% royalty on any PLS gold sales
AVH
Avita boosts skin restoration product portfolio with 'dermal matrix' – a kind of next-level gauze made of fake skin
Featured News
STX
Strike hands $48.5M contract to Clarke Energy to produce 20x 4.5MW gas engines for Sth Erregulla
MND
Albemarle lithium downsize burns $200M hole in Monadelphous's pocket as latter's contracts terminated