It is clear now, that the prelim report has not damaged the SP.
If I try to do an Enterprise Value (market cap + debt - cash and equivalents), and divide that by the SOI, then I get a value of 6c per share. I am wondering if that could be the reason that the SP has not tanked. I am unsure about my thinking here, since adding on debt increases the EV, and therefore the value per share. I understand the formula requires it, and it makes sense to me for a stock that is profitable (when debt is cheaper than equity). Not the case here.
Someone with good knowledge is required here.
Page 5 of the report is in my opinion a good statement of how the business model performs on a cash flow basis (i.e. "unencumbered" by accountancy considerations):= economics of scale not kicking in.
- receipts from customers went up by 37% yoy to $92.2m
- payments to suppliers and employees went up by 35% yoy to $94.2m
adding in interest paid, the net loss from operating activities went up by 56% yoy to $3.856 (from $2.446m)
I think page 5 is a good descriptor of how the business works as such, since there are no write down, value adjustments, non-cash items etc involved. It therefore gives an insight of how the money was flowing yoy, and what the management had to work with.
Replies and insights are welcome, and I stand to be corrected. Cheers
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- HLF
- Ann: Preliminary Final Report
Ann: Preliminary Final Report, page-19
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 15 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add HLF (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
1CG
ONE CLICK GROUP LIMITED
Mark Waller, MD
Mark Waller
MD
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online