Ann: New legal action to affirm interests in the Manono Project, page-307

You're defending management now but it was only a couple of posts ago that the content and tone of your message was completely different. You appear to insinuate in that you "doubled down" on Nigel's reference to a "Christmas Gift" coming our way. If this goes south the sh#t is going to hit the fan. Now that's fair enough I got caught up in the hype too but you can't turn around a couple of posts later with a rave endorsement for management after you appear to have your doubts. Sure you went onto express in this post that you feel everything will be fine in a few years time but that does not takeaway from the tone and concern in the post below: If you honestly thought everything was honkey-dorey and in the capable hands of the "best board on the ASX" you would not have made these comments:

"Nigel and the board are in serious hot water if this all goes south. Apart from his 50m shares, here's another reason why you bet the board is doing everything they can as the board has a law suit if in turn the illegal transfer turns out go be valid and the reason why Avz wasn't successful

Hindsight is a b&** when it's against you. I know I topped up with Nigel's exuberance, I believe his words was a Christmas gift"
"