General Discussion Topics, page-104692

This is the last statement I will make on the EGM Vote, in which I contend should be resounding NO for ALL retail holders of SYA or SYAXF. The Board in this notice even states this would be an EXTRAORDINARY measure. ( 10 Million Freebie Shares)

“The Board accepts that it’s decision to make a one-off award of shares to Mr. Lynch is NOT aligned with “LEADING PRACTICE.”

So if we want to be a leading company in this space it is not only the mining process we want to be leading in we also NEED to be run, operating in a LEADING way, mirroring Leading industry practices in rewarding Executives. Yes that means with Companies like APPLE, AMAZON, GOOGLE , MICROSOFT AND FACEBOOK, companies 100X value of Sayona aren’t delivering their Executives freebies like the BOD wants us to deliver to Mr. Lynch and Mr. Crawford and anyone else.

These other Super successful companies didn’t get (freebies) and continued to be driven for their passion in the business and driven to see someone other than themselves benefit. Those companies prospered along with their investors; those putting trust in them before the hype. Imagine I was closer to a Millionaire with this investment alone a year and half ago than I sit today, for all the accomplishments we all have taken substantial expectations off the table. Not to mention the offering given to shareholders through a lottery system, we have gotten SAYONA where they are toooo , when is our deviation from leading practices going to be realized.

I invested in FACEBOOK @ $21 Mr. Zuckerberg wasn’t offended by holders voting NO on 3 for 1 stock split. He remained focus, so what’s the point Shareholders can make their Executives BETTER by holding the accountable and at bear minimum to the LEADING INDUSTRY PRACTICE.

Cheers,