PLL General Discussion, page-1372

Aussie, i agree with your overall sentiment towards this - i think the point they're trying to get at though is this is strangely out of character. PLL has released every major NAL annoucement except this one (that I'm aware of anyway). Hell, they released A11's annoucement the other day and that was almost a nothing annoucement. I think alone it might not be anything to raise an eyebrow at, but combined with the study being late after we knew they had it, the name change from feasibility to technical, the semi suss numbers involved AND the fact that PLL hasn't released it to the market is a combination that is getting close to not passing the sniff test.

I don't want rabid conspiracy theories here either, I just think its something to take note of and keep an eye on.