"You cannot just add Creasy's stake in Andover with Creasy's stake in AZS and say it's just math."
The problem is that you can when they are substantial stakeholders. And you know that and I assume you understand the implications.
Just because the facts I have brought up serves as an inconvenient truth of the matter here does not give you the right to be dismissive and start your baseless and wrong accusations.
Of course I am not adding it if it were an immaterial holder as it is inconsequential.
Yes the math is correct and you know it.
The cost to retail holders and Azs paying 100% of the costs up until FID for Andover Lithium is also true.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AZS
- Ann: More Broad High-Grade Lithium Intersections at Andover
Ann: More Broad High-Grade Lithium Intersections at Andover, page-84
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 51 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
NEWS
Antler Copper Project hits major permitting milestone – air quality permit advances to final review