No Seriously - Where's the update?, page-180

It sure is a solid piece of research that you worked hard on and great to have it as reference, cheers again

Even in what you said in your post above, ("I am interested to see what excuse can possibly be made for the current debacle, and whether it will be backed by facts or be a work of fiction.") your synopsis of that re-listing time gives total relevance to today's debacle - fact or fiction ??

"9th of August [2019] we received an update, that stated the re-instatement was" "subject to the receipt by ASX of certain original documents being couriered from overseas"

So the ASX wouldn't accept copies of documents from them at that time, rightly so too.

We have absolutely no idea if there is any dialogue going on between the ASX and CGB at the moment, but that doesn't allow for an excuse to withold regular updates to the Market.

Full Continuous Disclosure is being ignored again - nothing new there.

What we do know is that the same personnel of CGB are still active just as they were in the re-listing process, with the exception of two who have not been replaced - thus leaving the board understrength, even moreso than they were when the ASX insisted they added a further non-ex director for the re-listing.

So basically, those who are in place at the present time are the same ones who rode in that first rodeo which looks more (imo) like having been a practice round.
They got through that round...