Level-headed, blunt assessment of Lake Resources, page-335

@arfbarf stated “ Does the technology work? Yes it does..”

IMHO, it may only work at a Science-Project level.

In the webinar, Scotty-from-TSR said

“Time is now for us to get focused on project planning, execution, and optimization.

As David mentioned, what we need to do is turn this from a science project to a real project.”

Finally recognition that this has been a science project till late means that the technology is below Technology Readiness Level 3.

All that post from Propunter2 about Lilac’s technology being at a higher maturity level was just fiction. Post #: 65078988

We have very little insight into Lilac’s scope of work to mature and industrialise their technology.

Can anyone point me to any product data sheets on Lilac’s existing Science-Project DLE modules or the Real DLE modules that they’re developing?

Why isn’t Lilac presenting their detailed plans for their work to the market?

Are LKE intentionally using the Logistics, Infrastructure and Power gaps to take the focus of the risks of maturing Lilac’s technology to the size and performance needed?

Does LKE/Lilac expect more “gaps” in the technology to be revealed?

https://lilacsolutions.com/technology/

.
DYOR and stay tuned for more disaster in the Catamarca!