still sprout garbage even in the light of facts and history
here's some history - sounds like climate science to me
From the mid-17th century, naturalists attempted to reconcile
mechanical philosophy with theology, initially within a
biblical timescale. By the late 18th century, there was increasing acceptance of prehistoric epochs. Geologists found evidence of a succession of
geological ages with climate changes. There were various competing theories about these changes;
Buffon proposed that the Earth had begun as an incandescent globe and was very gradually cooling.
James Hutton, whose ideas of cyclic change over huge periods were later dubbed
uniformitarianism, was among those who found signs of past glacial activity in places too warm for
glaciers in modern times.
[11]In 1815
Jean-Pierre Perraudin described for the first time how glaciers might be responsible for the giant boulders seen in alpine valleys. As he hiked in the
Val de Bagnes, he noticed giant granite rocks that were scattered around the narrow valley. He knew that it would take an exceptional force to move such large rocks. He also noticed how glaciers left stripes on the land and concluded that it was the ice that had carried the boulders down into the valleys.
[12]His idea was initially met with disbelief.
Jean de Charpentier wrote, "I found his hypothesis so extraordinary and even so extravagant that I considered it as not worth examining or even considering."
[13] Despite Charpentier's initial rejection, Perraudin eventually convinced
Ignaz Venetz that it might be worth studying. Venetz convinced Charpentier, who in turn convinced the influential scientist
Louis Agassiz that the glacial theory had merit.
[12]Agassiz developed a theory of what he termed "
Ice Age"—when glaciers covered Europe and much of North America. In 1837 Agassiz was the first to scientifically propose that the Earth had been subject to a past
ice age.
[14]William Buckland had been a leading proponent in Britain of
flood geology, later dubbed
catastrophism, which accounted for erratic boulders and other "diluvium" as relics of the
Biblical flood. This was strongly opposed by
Charles Lyell's version of Hutton's uniformitarianism and was gradually abandoned by Buckland and other catastrophist geologists. A field trip to the Alps with Agassiz in October 1838 convinced Buckland that features in Britain had been caused by glaciation, and both he and Lyell strongly supported the ice age theory which became widely accepted by the 1870s.
[11]Before the concept of ice ages was proposed,
Joseph Fourier in 1824 reasoned based on physics that Earth's atmosphere kept the planet warmer than would be the case in a vacuum. Fourier recognized that the atmosphere transmitted
visible light waves efficiently to the earth's surface. The earth then absorbed visible light and emitted
infrared radiation in response, but the atmosphere did not transmit infrared efficiently, which therefore increased surface temperatures. He also suspected that human activities could influence the radiation balance and Earth's climate, although he focused primarily on land-use changes. In an 1827 paper, Fourier stated,
[15]The establishment and progress of human societies, the action of natural forces, can notably change, and in vast regions, the state of the surface, the distribution of water and the great movements of the air. Such effects are able to make to vary, in the course of many centuries, the average degree of heat; because the analytic expressions contain coefficients relating to the state of the surface and which greatly influence the temperature.
