Is anyone else wondering why Michael dodged my observable measurable repeatable experiment using his flat horizon photo and a straight edge, which demonstrated curvature?
Just trying to decide whether to move on to my next observation, which is that if "space time" is a concept then so is "earth" or "flatness", because both only exist in language we use to communicated the neural activity our brain registers when our senses relay electrical currents via our nervous system.
If the many experiments and observations which disprove Michaels hilarious "sciency" version of reality can just be ignored or called "ideas", then so can everything in existence.
Also hilarious that such a sciency person is willing to accept that there is an unmeasurable, unseen, unproven God, but not space time.
Michael is a fraud, can't even abide by his own rules. What a surprise.
