one would hope this is the case while still on the other hand why would c4v give up 7% for 18m. Bringing c4vs ownership down to 30% but at the same time signalling they needed the coin and we’re unable to
secure elsewhere or had a preference for us to own as opposed to others possibly.
and at the same time would this be decreasing there obligations to current loans to IM3NY simultaneously
just my thoughts throwing out there
70% increase ownership in IM3NY.pros vs cons, page-8
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?