Can someone here please give me a brief explanation of why SYR is better value than RNU when both ASX listed graphite companies have the same market cap. RNU appears to have a partnership with Mitsubishi while SYR has one with TSLA. Given Syrah is more advanced is the market placing higher expectation on RNU ( which has an Australian based resource) being more profitable in the future or are there other factors at play? Opinions welcome.
Media Reports, page-1633
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1,868 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add SYR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
22.0¢ |
Change
-0.005(2.22%) |
Mkt cap ! $227.6M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 22.0¢ | 23.3¢ | 21.5¢ | $638.1K | 2.853M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 64122 | 22.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 22.5¢ | 11500 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 13/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SYR (ASX) Chart |