resourcebull,
We knew it was going to be a tight reservoir (regulars will confirm). Ooraminna-1 only flowed 12Mcfd, and I don't think reversing any amount of formation damage was going to change that into 12MMcfd.
People are here saying that 100Mcfd is a bad result - of course it is, for a conventional reservoir. But for unconventional gas, from 5m of net pay, it's actually pretty good (assuming it can be sustained).
If this was a CSG well in Queensland LNG country, pre-frac, 100Mcfd from 5m of net pay would be a good well. If this was the Barnett Shale or the Marcellus Shale in the US, it would be a good well.
Let's wait and see what the final flow rate and the final GIP calculations are. If we end up with, say, 200Mcfd and 1TCF GIP, we could have a tight gas reserve, a mini Barnett Shale. Not to mention the implications this might have for Johnstone-1, a tight oil prospect.
Still risky? Definitely. But that 7c share price is looking pretty good I think.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CTP
- o-2
o-2, page-53
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 32 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CTP (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
5.4¢ |
Change
0.004(8.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $39.96M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
5.2¢ | 5.4¢ | 5.0¢ | $5.66K | 112.6K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 548291 | 4.9¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
5.4¢ | 96554 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 548291 | 0.049 |
2 | 25520 | 0.048 |
1 | 100000 | 0.046 |
2 | 173952 | 0.045 |
1 | 50000 | 0.044 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.054 | 96554 | 1 |
0.056 | 19995 | 1 |
0.058 | 172431 | 1 |
0.060 | 212209 | 4 |
0.062 | 112737 | 2 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 11/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
CTP (ASX) Chart |